Archive for January, 2015

1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...

Published by Frank Biggs on 12 Jan 2015

Carter Reservoir Wild Horses Face Starvation – Part 2

First response from William Simpson to the Modoc Record Article:

Another picture from Laura Simpson and her wild herd of horses that free range on the their property.

Another picture from Laura Simpson and her wild herd of horses that free range on the their property.

First let me say that I always enjoy a good debate, so thanks for the reply.

In your response, you have digressed significantly from the ‘facts’ published by the Modoc Record, which you sent to me, and which is what we are supposedly talking about.

You originally sent me their article as the basis for what? An argument or reason that purports a pretense to support the removal all the horses from the lands that were set aside by a Congressional Act for their existence along with the local game animals?

Now that the Modoc Record article has been myth-busted, it seems you’re abandoning it, and moving-off to even shaky unsupported grounds for a further debate? That’s no fun… I can’t debate you while you’re sinking in quicksand.

Taking what the BLM has stated and which the Modoc Record has reported, as being ‘their’ (not mine) take on the situation over in Modoc County is more than adequate to prove the points I have made beyond any reasonable doubt. So why the further debate?  What’s the point? If you don’t like horses, then just say so! What might be more relevant would be telling us why you don’t like horses.

If I didn’t know better, I would say you were practicing-up to be a politician  {;-) …. talking at length without staying on point. The article is what it is and says what is says… a re-report from the BLM… we don’t need to go beyond that with a boat-load of personal speculations and debates on any unfounded, unreported possibilities..

The points I have made are in fact fully supported by the article itself. I needn’t make any assumptions or speculations in support of the points I have made. It’s really as simple as; the article is a farce, and qualifies as good propaganda and nothing more. Don’t tell me that you drank the Kool Aid and now you’re defending it?

It’s not worthy of anyone’s time to debate a whole bunch of unfounded conjectures. I am taking the BLM report and the Modoc Record article on the report at its face…. and it’s just nonsensical.

The BLMs position is just so stupid! If the 23,000 acres of land cannot support 50 horses, how in God’s name can it support 1200+ cows, plus hundreds of big-game animals??? How?? And if that’s the case, and the land that was designated for the wild horses, has trouble supporting just the horses, then why would the BLM allow 1,278 cows plus calves to also graze the same land? Take about obtuse management practices! That’s one for the book!

As the article says, the area is called: “The 23,000 acre Carter Reservoir wild horse Herd Management Area” for a reason!  Note the keywords ‘wild horse’… it’s not called the ‘23,000 acre cattle grazing area’; nor is it called the ‘the 23,000 acre tribal food zone’. This land is public land that was set aside by a Congressional Act for the ‘wild horses’.

They (the BLM and the Modoc Record) have very clearly inferred that the 23-thousand acres of land at the Carter Reservoir cannot support 50 horses (they are ‘starving’ and ‘thirsty’)!  I have to say that if 23,000 acres works for grazing 1278 cows, calves and hundreds of big-game animals, it’s a scientific impossibility that the same land cannot support and allow 50 wild horses to winter-over; or, that somehow 50 horses are the reason why this vast area of land is over-grazed. Any such assertions, based upon the facts presented by the BLM themselves through the Modoc Record, amounts to a monumental pile of dung.

There is only TWO logical assumptions that can follow which are factually supported using the BLM/Modoc Record’s own facts:

1. The BLM is allowing the land to be severely overgrazed by permit ($) grazing (follow the money and you always find where the bad smell originates) to the point where the land cannot sustain a lousy 50 head of horses!  This IS total and complete mismanagement of the lands.

2. The BLM and the Cattlemen don’t care to have any horses on the land that was specifically set aside for them (remember the title of the land IS: “The 23,000 acre Carter Reservoir wild horse Herd Management Area”)… so this is how they deal with that; invent a situation where the horses must be removed. Again, mismanagement of the lands and the Protected horses by the BLM, and this may even amount to a fraud being perpetrated against the American trust; this is public land, not private cattle-ranchers land.

There is another very important fact that is often overlooked:

There are thousands of big-game animals that also live out there at Carter area (deer, elk, antelope) who also need grazing and water and the ability to winter-over. These animals are important to the recreational hunting businesses, which arguably provide a very significant amount of revenue to local and federal economies. If the 50 horses can’t hack it, these important big-game animals are also in trouble too! And that means hunters are being screwed-over by the over-grazing of the public land by commercial cattle! I don’t know about you, but I like hunting as does all of my family, and from that standpoint alone, the BLM is yet again, mismanaging the lands and assets!

There are no other logical conclusions that can be drawn using just the ‘facts’ that the BLM and the Modoc Record have published. None!  That is unless you want to begin your debate with ‘Once Upon A Time’.  And I really don’t have the time or desire to hear or debate any fairy tales.

The problem is crystal clear, and it’s not about 50 wild horses. 

Best Regards,

Bill
Capt. William E. Simpson II – USMM Ret.
Semper Veritas / Semper Paratus

1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...

Published by Frank Biggs on 12 Jan 2015

Carter Reservoir Wild Horses Face Starvation – Part 1

This picture of Wild Horses was taken by Laura Simpson 2014

This picture of Wild Horses was taken by Laura Simpson 2014

 

I think that hunters are getting screwed by overgrazing of cattle by the industrial cattle ranchers… family ranchers have their own lands for the most part so they aren’t the culprits … and any hunter knows that if 50 lousy horses are being starved-out by over-grazing of cattle, then the big-game animals, the ones we pay big money to hunt, are having their numbers decimated along with the wild horses!  So we battle-on!  Cheers! Bill

 

 

TO: The Editor – Modoc County Record News
RE: Your article titled: “
Carter wild horses face starvation, thirst

I respectfully request that you publish my response to the aforementioned article as an OP-ED.

Let’s consider the so-called facts stated in your ‘report’, which is contained herein below in its entirety to keep my response in context: 

First:
The article states there are 1278 cows plus calves grazing on the Carter Reservoir horse management area that is shared with a mere 50 horses. Yet, 50 lousy horses are supposedly starving! Do the cows eat dirt and absorb water by osmosis from the atmosphere? Why would ranchers even want to graze 1278 cows on lands that cannot even support a lousy 50 head of horse? And what about all the hundreds of other animals who live on that same land;deer, elk, antelope, etc.?
Secondly:
If the grazing pressure on the ‘public’ lands by commercial cattlemen is mismanaged by the BLM to the point where the cattle eat everything, leaving nothing for a few horses, deer, elk and antelope to winter-over on, who’s fault is that? How does this impact the hundreds of game animals? And we have had some decent rains lately, so water over the past couple months shouldn’t have been an issue. Are the deer, elk and antelope also migrating by the droves onto private lands as well? And are they also being trapped and transported anywhere? If so, then where? If not, are they also starving and dehydrated as well? Could this be the ultimate result of ‘over-grazing’ of public lands?The BLM has some serious explaining to do on this one for sure! Logic says the problem clearly resides with the BLM; either they are simply misrepresenting what’s going on to the public, so protected horses, which produce no revenues or taxes can be removed and are subsequently destroyed by slaughter; or, they are mismanaging the public assets (the land and the horses are public assets); or, a combination of both of the foregoing.
Third:
The BLM knows exactly how many horses were removed due to the ‘reportedly’ austere starvation conditions (16 horses), yet they have no idea as to how many cows were removed?? (if any)… What?  Is that how you ‘manage’? You count one thing but not the other? Can you imagine the response of any small business owner if a cashier only counted the pennies and forgot to count the quarters in his till before he turned it in at the end of the shift. This is a much bigger deal!
Fourth:
If the Carter Reservoir management area is such a horrid area (lack of forage and water) why would any rancher ever want to graze any cattle and tender calves there? The report you have published is by its own stated facts highly contradictory and illogical.It’s a sad state of affairs in America when people are so propagandized by special interest groups that they will swallow almost anything at face value without applying even the slightest token of logical analysis. Isn’t that the job of a good journalist?In conclusion, the article as you have published it, is on its face a farce.

Respectfully,
Capt. William E. Simpson II – USMM Ret.
Semper Veritas / Semper Paratus

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 799 access attempts in the last 7 days.